Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| PEBS× | Ny økologisk paradigmeskala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Miljøpsykologi | Miljøpsykologi |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2002 | 2000 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Debra Lemke, Anja Kollmuss | Riley E. Dunlap |
| Type≠ | Self-report frequency and behavior checklist | Self-report Likert scale |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. DOI ↗ | Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP). Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | PEBS, Sustainability Behavior Scale | NEP, New Environmental Paradigm Scale |
| Relaterede≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Resumé≠ | The Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS) measures the frequency and breadth of environmentally responsible actions that individuals perform in their daily lives, including recycling, energy conservation, water conservation, sustainable transportation, sustainable consumption, and environmental activism. Unlike attitude scales that measure beliefs or concerns, the PEBS captures actual or self-reported behaviors—providing a bridge between environmental intentions and demonstrable actions. The scale is essential for evaluating behavior-change interventions, tracking progress toward sustainability goals, and understanding which demographic and psychographic segments adopt environmentally responsible practices. | The New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale measures endorsement of an ecocentric worldview that views humans as embedded within, rather than dominant over, nature. Developed by Dunlap et al. (2000) to update the original 1978 scale, the NEP assesses environmental beliefs across multiple dimensions including balance of nature, limits to growth, human exceptionalism, and nature's intrinsic value. It is widely used in environmental psychology, sustainability research, and conservation communication studies. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|