ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Penman-Monteith-ligningen×Afgrødevækstmodeller (DSSAT/APSIM)×
FagområdeAgronomiAgronomi
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår1948-19651993-2003
OphavspersonHoward Latimer Penman, John MonteithJames W. Jones, Gerbrand T. Hoogenboom (DSSAT); Brian A. Keating, Peter S. Carberry (APSIM)
TypeMechanistic evapotranspiration modelMechanistic crop simulation pipeline
Oprindelig kildePenman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 193(1032), 120-145. DOI ↗Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., et al. (2003). The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18(3-4), 235-265. DOI ↗
AliasserPM Equation, FAO-56 PM, Evapotranspiration ModelDSSAT, APSIM, Crop Simulation Model
Relaterede33
ResuméThe Penman-Monteith equation is a mechanistic model for estimating evapotranspiration (ET), the combined loss of water from soil and plant canopies to the atmosphere. First proposed by Penman (1948) for bare soil and water surfaces, then extended by Monteith (1965) to incorporate plant resistance to water vapor diffusion, it has become the international standard for water balance studies, crop water requirement calculation, and hydrological modeling.Crop growth models are mechanistic simulation systems designed to predict crop development, biomass accumulation, and yield under varying environmental and management conditions. DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer) and APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulator) are the most widely used platforms, developed in the 1990s-2000s to support agronomic decision-making and climate adaptation research.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Penman-Monteith Equation · Crop Growth Model. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare