ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Nominal Group Technique×Action Research×Indholdsanalyse×Delphi-metoden×
FagområdeKvalitativKvalitativ forskningKvalitativKvalitativ
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår19711946Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181963
OphavspersonAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchNorman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation)
TypeQualitative research methodMethodQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueStructured iterative expert-elicitation process
Oprindelig kildeDelbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. DOI ↗
AliasserNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiryİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisDelphi Yöntemi, Delphi technique, expert consensus method
Relaterede6155
ResuméThe Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.The Delphi method is a structured, iterative survey technique developed by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer at the RAND Corporation in 1963 for eliciting and converging expert opinion on complex topics where empirical data are unavailable or insufficient. It collects independent judgements from a geographically dispersed expert panel over multiple anonymous rounds, feeding aggregated results back to participants after each round so they can revise their views in light of the group's collective position.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Nominal Group Technique · Action Research · Content Analysis · Delphi Method. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare