ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Ny metode til bestemmelse af objektive kriterievægte×Kombineret Kompromisløsning×
FagområdeBeslutningstagningBeslutningstagning
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Oprindelsesår20172019
OphavspersonBulut, E.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
Oprindelig kildeBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
Aliasser
Relaterede88
ResuméNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: NMD · COCOSO. Hentet 2026-06-17 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare