Sammenlign metoder

	Ny metode til bestemmelse af objektive kriterievægte	AHPSort	Additiv Ratio Assessment
Fagområde	Beslutningstagning	Beslutningstagning	Beslutningstagning
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Oprindelsesår	2017	2012	2010
Ophavsperson	Bulut, E.	Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C.	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
Type	Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)	AHP-based sorting with limiting or central profiles	Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Oprindelig kilde	Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment	Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy
Aliasser	—	—	—
Relaterede	8	8	8
Resumé	NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHPSORT (AHPSort — AHP-based classification of alternatives into ordered categories) is a sorting multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.