ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Netværksmotif-analyse×Fællesskabsdetektion×
FagområdeNetværksanalyseNetværksanalyse
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår20022002–2019 (algorithm family)
OphavspersonLouvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)
TypeStatistical pattern-detection method for directed graphsGraph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family
Oprindelig kildeMilo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002). Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex Networks. Science, 298(5594), 824-827. DOI ↗Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗
Aliassernetwork motifs, subgraph significance profile, Ağ Motif Analizi (Network Motifs)graph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)
Relaterede35
ResuméNetwork motif analysis is a statistical method for directed networks, introduced by Milo, Shen-Orr, and Alon in 2002, that identifies small recurring subgraph patterns — motifs — that appear significantly more often than would be expected in a comparable random network. By comparing a real network against a null ensemble of randomised graphs, the method reveals the elementary structural building blocks that define the functional organisation of biological regulatory networks, social networks, and other complex systems.Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Network Motif Analysis · Community Detection. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare