Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Multiple Case-Based Classic Grounded Theory× | Komparativ casestudie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Kvalitativ | Kvalitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 1967 (foundational); multi-case adaptation developed through 1970s–1990s | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (foundational); Glaser extended for comparative multi-case contexts | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| Type≠ | Qualitative inductive theory-generation design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Aliasser | multi-case CGT, classic GT with multiple cases, comparative grounded theory, Glaserian multi-case grounded theory | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| Relaterede≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Resumé≠ | Multiple case-based classic grounded theory (CGT) extends Glaser and Strauss's original inductive framework by grounding theory development simultaneously across two or more purposefully selected cases. Rather than studying a single site or participant group, the researcher treats each case as a distinct analytic unit while using the constant comparative method to draw cross-case theoretical insights. The goal is the same as in all classic GT: emergence of a substantive theory that explains the main concern of participants — but the multi-case structure broadens the conceptual base and supports more robust theoretical abstraction. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|