ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795)×Analytisk Hierarkiproces×
FagområdeBeslutningstagningBeslutningstagning
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Oprindelsesår20191980
OphavspersonAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R.Saaty, T. L.
TypeDistance-based ranking — m-polar hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS — pole-wise max/min ideals on a weighted mHF decision matrix (Eqs. 1–2), mHF Euclidean distance (Eqs. 3–4), closeness coefficient E_j' (Eq. 5)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)
Oprindelig kildeAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry (MDPI) DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713
Aliasser
Relaterede38
ResuméMPF-HF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795) — multi-criteria group decision-making by extending TOPSIS to the m-polar hesitant fuzzy (mHF) set framework; pole-wise mHPIS/mHNIS extraction, mHF Euclidean distance and closeness coefficient ranking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: MPF-HF-TOPSIS · AHP. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare