ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy-udvidelse af TOPSIS×Kriterie-vigtighed gennem interkriterie-korrelation×
FagområdeBeslutningstagningBeslutningstagning
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Oprindelsesår20191995
OphavspersonAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
Typem-Polar Hesitant outranking/ranking — m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy Element (mHFE: m-tuple of HFEs, ℏ_m: Z → P([0,1]^m))Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Oprindelig kildeAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Aliasser
Relaterede88
ResuméMHF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: MHF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare