ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy-udvidelse af TOPSIS×Best-Worst-metoden×
FagområdeBeslutningstagningBeslutningstagning
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Oprindelsesår20192015
OphavspersonAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R.Rezaei, J.
Typem-Polar Hesitant outranking/ranking — m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy Element (mHFE: m-tuple of HFEs, ℏ_m: Z → P([0,1]^m))Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Oprindelig kildeAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
Aliasser
Relaterede88
ResuméMHF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: MHF-TOPSIS · BWM. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare