ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Manifesto Coding×Expert Survey×
FagområdePolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår2001
OphavspersonManifesto Research Group / Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR)Comparative party-positioning research (Castles & Mair; Chapel Hill team)
TypeQuantitative content analysis of party manifestosSurvey of subject-matter experts to measure latent positions
Oprindelig kildeBudge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199244003Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. DOI ↗
AliasserCMP coding, MARPOR coding, Manifesto content analysis, Party manifesto codingExpert judgment survey, Party expert survey, Chapel Hill Expert Survey, Expert placement survey
Relaterede44
ResuméManifesto coding is the quantitative content-analysis methodology of the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR) for measuring parties' policy preferences from their election manifestos. Trained coders break each manifesto into quasi-sentences and assign every unit to one of a fixed set of policy categories. Counting how often each category appears yields salience measures, and combining pro- and anti- categories produces position scores such as the left–right RILE index, giving comparable estimates of party positions across more than fifty democracies since 1945.An expert survey measures latent political quantities — most often parties' positions on policy dimensions — by asking a panel of country and subject-matter experts to place the objects of interest on structured numerical scales. Averaging many experts' judgments yields position estimates, while the spread across experts provides a built-in measure of uncertainty and reliability. The Chapel Hill Expert Survey is the leading example, producing comparable measures of European parties' positions on ideology, European integration, and many specific issues over time.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Manifesto Coding · Expert Survey. Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare