ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Maskinlærings-augmenteret propensity score matching×Propensity Score Matching×
FagområdeKausal inferensForskningsstatistik
FamilieRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår20041983
OphavspersonMcCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypeCausal inference / matchingMethod
Oprindelig kildeMcCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
AliasserML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relaterede63
ResuméMachine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare