ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Barthel Index: Vurdering af funktionelt resultat efter iskæmisk apopleksi×MSFC: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite×
FagområdeNeurologiNeurologi
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår19651999
OphavspersonFlorence I. Mahoney and Dorothea BarthelGary Cutter, Richard Rudick, and NMSS Consortium
TypeClinician or caregiver reportClinician-administered performance test
Oprindelig kildeBarthel, D. W., Gottwald, B. (1965). Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14(5), 61-65. DOI ↗Cutter, G. R., Baier, M. L., Rudick, R. A., et al. (1999). Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Multiple Sclerosis, 5(4), 244-250. DOI ↗
AliasserBarthel Index, Modified Barthel IndexMS Functional Composite
Relaterede44
ResuméThe Barthel Index (BI) is the most widely used functional assessment tool for measuring disability and dependency in activities of daily living, particularly in stroke and neurological rehabilitation. Developed by Florence Mahoney and Dorothea Barthel in 1965, the 10-item index quantifies independence in basic self-care and mobility tasks. The Barthel Index is the standard functional outcome measure in stroke trials, rehabilitation settings, and long-term follow-up cohorts, predicting discharge disposition and functional prognosis.The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is an objective, performance-based assessment of MS-related disability capturing three key functional domains: lower extremity mobility, upper extremity coordination, and cognitive/processing speed. Developed in 1999 by the National MS Society and adopted widely in clinical trials, the MSFC provides quantifiable endpoints complementing the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The three-component design addresses EDSS limitations by including cognition and standardizing measurement via timed tasks.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: BI · MSFC. Hentet 2026-06-17 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare