Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Heterogene Behandlingseffekter (CATE / Meta-Learners)× | Propensity Score Matching× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde≠ | Kausal inferens | Forskningsstatistik |
| Familie≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2018 | 1983 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Wager & Athey (causal forest); Künzel et al. (meta-learners) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Type≠ | Causal machine-learning framework | Method |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Wager, S. & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser≠ | conditional average treatment effect, CATE, meta-learners, causal forest | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Relaterede≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Resumé≠ | Heterogeneous Treatment Effects is a machine-learning framework that estimates how a treatment effect varies across individuals — the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). It bundles meta-learner strategies such as the T-Learner, S-Learner, X-Learner and R-Learner alongside the causal forest of Wager and Athey (2018) and Künzel et al. (2019). | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|