Sammenlign metoder

	Gradient Boosting	Regulariseret Boosting	Robust Gradient Boosting
Fagområde	Maskinlæring	Maskinlæring	Maskinlæring
Familie	Machine learning	Machine learning	Machine learning
Oprindelsesår	2001	2001–2016	2001
Ophavsperson	Friedman, J. H.	Friedman, J. H.; extended by Chen & Guestrin	Friedman, J. H. (with Huber loss from Huber, P. J.)
Type	Ensemble (sequential boosting of decision trees)	Regularized ensemble (boosting with shrinkage/penalty)	Ensemble (boosted trees with robust loss)
Oprindelig kilde	Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.	Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.	Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.
Aliasser	Gradient Boosting (GBM), GBM, gradient boosted trees, gradient boosting machine	shrinkage boosting, penalized boosting, regularized gradient boosting, L1/L2 boosting	gradient boosting with Huber loss, robust GBM, outlier-robust boosting, robust gradient-boosted trees
Relaterede	5	5	6
Resumé	Gradient Boosting is an ensemble learning method, formalised by Jerome H. Friedman in 2001, that combines a sequence of weak learners — typically shallow decision trees — so that each new tree is fitted to minimise the residual errors of the trees before it. It is the core algorithm behind popular implementations such as XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost.	Regularized boosting extends gradient boosting by adding explicit controls — shrinkage (learning rate), L1/L2 weight penalties, subsampling, and tree-complexity limits — to the objective function and the update rule. These constraints reduce overfitting, stabilise the model on noisy or small datasets, and are the core reason why systems such as XGBoost and LightGBM consistently outperform vanilla boosting on real-world tabular benchmarks.	Robust Gradient Boosting is gradient boosting trained with outlier-resistant loss functions — most commonly the Huber loss or quantile (pinball) loss — instead of squared-error loss. Proposed in Friedman's seminal 2001 paper, this variant produces predictions far less distorted by extreme values or contaminated labels, while retaining the full predictive power of gradient-boosted trees.