Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Fejltilstands- og effektanalyse× | Analytisk Hierarkiproces× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Beslutningstagning | Beslutningstagning |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 1995 | 1980 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Stamatis, D. H. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Risk priority via product of O·S·D ratings | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Stamatis, D. H. (1995). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution. ASQ Quality Press ISBN: 978-0-87389-300-8 | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Aliasser | — | — |
| Relaterede | 8 | 8 |
| Resumé≠ | FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stamatis, D. H. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|