ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Feltkortlæggende scoping review×Bibliometrisk Analyse×
FagområdeScientometriScientometri
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår2005 (foundational framework); field-mapping purpose formalised c. 2015–20181969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
OphavspersonArksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework); field-mapping purpose formalised by Munn et al. and Peters et al.Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
TypeEvidence synthesis — systematic review variantQuantitative literature analysis
Oprindelig kildeMunn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic review and scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
Aliasserfield-mapping scoping study, evidence-mapping scoping review, field map review, scoping review for field mappingbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Relaterede66
ResuméA field-mapping scoping review is a purposive variant of the scoping review in which the overarching goal is to chart the conceptual and empirical landscape of a research field — identifying what has been studied, by whom, using which methods, and where knowledge gaps remain. It follows the Arksey and O'Malley scoping framework but is explicitly oriented toward producing a structured map of a field rather than answering a focused clinical or policy question.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Field-mapping Scoping review · Bibliometric Analysis. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare