Sammenlign metoder

	Feltbaseret Straussian Grounded Theory	Metoden med konstant sammenligning
Fagområde	Kvalitativ	Kvalitativ
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Oprindelsesår	1990	1967
Ophavsperson	Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin	Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss
Type	Qualitative theory-building approach	Qualitative research method
Oprindelig kilde	Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Aliasser	Straussian GT with fieldwork, fieldwork-grounded theory, Strauss-Corbin grounded theory, constructivist Straussian GT	CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysis
Relaterede	4	6
Resumé	Field-based Straussian grounded theory applies the systematic coding procedures of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory tradition to data generated through sustained fieldwork — direct observation, ethnographic notes, informal conversations, and artefact collection — rather than relying solely on formal interviews. The goal is to generate a substantive theory that is firmly anchored in the natural social setting where the phenomenon occurs, capturing both interaction and context.	The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions.