Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Feeling Thermometer Analysis× | Affective Polarization Measurement× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Politisk psykologi | Politisk psykologi |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 1964 | 2012 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | American National Election Studies / Aage Clausen | Shanto Iyengar, Gaurav Sood & Yphtach Lelkes |
| Type≠ | Affect rating instrument | Composite survey index |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257. DOI ↗ | Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating Scale | Affective Polarization Index, Partisan Affect Gap, Thermometer Difference Measure |
| Relaterede | 4 | 4 |
| Resumé≠ | The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research. | Affective polarization measurement quantifies the gap between how positively people feel toward their own political party (the in-party) and how negatively they feel toward the opposing party (the out-party). Iyengar, Sood and Lelkes (2012) showed that this affective divide has grown sharply even where issue positions have not, reframing polarization as a social-identity phenomenon of partisan like and dislike rather than ideological distance. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|