Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)× | Katz Index for Independence i Aktiviteter i Dagliglivet (ADL)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Sygepleje | Sygepleje |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2005 | 1963 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Lucy Yardley | Sidney Katz |
| Type≠ | Patient self-report questionnaire | Clinician-rated or observational functional assessment |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Yardley, L., Beyer, N., Eklund, K., et al. (2005). Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing, 34(6), 614-619. DOI ↗ | Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A., & Jaffe, M. W. (1963). Studies of Illness in the Aged: The Index of ADL, a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA, 185(12), 914-919. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | FES-I, International Falls Efficacy Scale, Falls Self-Efficacy | Katz Index, Katz ADL Scale, Index of ADL |
| Relaterede | 3 | 3 |
| Resumé≠ | The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), developed by Lucy Yardley and colleagues in 2005, is a validated tool measuring fear of falling and confidence in balance in older adults and others at risk of falls. The 16-item scale assesses how confident a person feels performing daily activities without falling (self-efficacy for fall avoidance). Fear of falling is not anxiety disorder but a rational concern that, if excessive, can lead to activity restriction, deconditioning, and further fall risk. The FES-I is used internationally in clinical practice and research to identify patients at risk for this vicious cycle and guide fall prevention interventions. | The Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, developed by Sidney Katz and colleagues in 1963, is one of the earliest and most widely used tools for assessing functional status in older adults and persons with chronic illness. The scale evaluates six essential self-care activities (bathing, dressing, toileting, transfer, continence, feeding) through direct observation or interview and assigns an overall grade (A through G) reflecting the degree of independence. It remains a foundational instrument in geriatric assessment, rehabilitation medicine, and long-term care settings. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|