Sammenlign metoder

	Forklarlig One-Class SVM	Autoencoder Anomalidetektion
Fagområde	Maskinlæring	Maskinlæring
Familie	Machine learning	Machine learning
Oprindelsesår	1999 (OCSVM); 2017–present (explainability integration)	2006–2014
Ophavsperson	Schölkopf, B. et al. (OCSVM); explainability layer via Lundberg & Lee (SHAP, 2017) and related works	Hinton, G. E. & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (autoencoders); applied to anomaly detection through multiple authors in the 2010s
Type	Anomaly/novelty detection with post-hoc or intrinsic explainability	Unsupervised deep learning (reconstruction-based)
Oprindelig kilde	Schölkopf, B., Williamson, R., Smola, A., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Platt, J. (1999). Support vector method for novelty detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 12, 582–588.	Chalapathy, R. & Chawla, S. (2019). Deep learning for anomaly detection: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.03407.
Aliasser	XOC-SVM, Interpretable One-Class SVM, SHAP-augmented OCSVM, Explainable Novelty Detection SVM	AE anomaly detection, reconstruction-error anomaly detection, deep autoencoder outlier detection, unsupervised autoencoder anomaly detection
Relaterede	4	3
Resumé	Explainable One-Class SVM pairs the classic One-Class Support Vector Machine anomaly detector — which learns a tight boundary around normal data without requiring labeled anomalies — with post-hoc explainability methods such as SHAP or LIME to reveal which features drive each novelty or anomaly score, converting an opaque decision boundary into an auditable, feature-attributable signal.	Autoencoder anomaly detection trains a neural network to compress and then reconstruct normal data. Because the model has only ever learned what normal looks like, anomalous inputs produce noticeably higher reconstruction errors — and those errors become the anomaly score. The method requires no labeled anomalies and scales naturally to high-dimensional data such as sensor streams, images, and log records.