Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Ensemble Federated Learning× | Stemmeensemble× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Maskinlæring | Maskinlæring |
| Familie | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2017–2019 | 1990s–2004 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | McMahan et al. (FedAvg) extended by subsequent ensemble work | Lam & Suen; Kuncheva, L. I. (systematic treatment) |
| Type≠ | Ensemble meta-strategy over federated clients | Ensemble (combination of multiple classifiers by vote) |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), PMLR 54, 1273–1282. link ↗ | Kuncheva, L. I. (2004). Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0-471-21078-8 |
| Aliasser | federated ensemble learning, EFL, federated model ensembling, federated multi-model aggregation | majority voting classifier, hard voting, soft voting ensemble, plurality voting ensemble |
| Relaterede≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Resumé≠ | Ensemble Federated Learning combines the privacy-preserving distribution of federated learning with ensemble aggregation: each participating client trains its own local model on private data, and the server aggregates predictions — or model parameters — from all clients using ensemble strategies such as voting, averaging, or stacking, instead of simple parameter averaging alone. | A voting ensemble trains several diverse classifiers independently and combines their predictions by a vote: hard voting picks the class chosen by the most models, while soft voting averages their class-probability estimates, optionally with per-model weights. The combination usually outperforms any individual member, and requires no additional training after the base models are fitted. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|