ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Dobbel-blind prætest-posttest eksperimentelt design×Kontrolgruppedesign×
FagområdeForsøgsdesignForsøgsdesign
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
OprindelsesårMid-20th century (combined form widely adopted 1960s onward)1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification)
OphavspersonCampbell & Stanley (formalized pretest-posttest design, 1963); double-blind blinding convention developed in clinical pharmacology (19th-20th century)Ronald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley
TypeTrue experimental designExperimental research design
Oprindelig kildeCampbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 171-246). Rand McNally. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗
AliasserDB-pretest-posttest design, double-blind pre-post design, masked pretest-posttest RCT, double-masked pre-post experimentcontrolled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design
Relaterede54
ResuméThe double-blind pretest-posttest experimental design is a true experiment in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions, outcome data are collected both before and after the intervention, and neither participants nor outcome assessors know which condition each participant received. Combining baseline measurement with strong blinding, the design controls for both pre-existing group differences and expectancy-driven bias, making it a gold-standard approach in clinical and behavioral research.Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Double-blind pretest-posttest experimental design · Control Group Experimental Design. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare