ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Modificeret TOPSIS baseret på D-tal (Deng Evidence Theory)×Best-Worst-metoden×
FagområdeBeslutningstagningBeslutningstagning
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Oprindelsesår20162015
OphavspersonFei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y.Rezaei, J.
TypeD-Number ranking — D:Ω→[0,1] with Σ_{B⊆Ω} D(B) ≤ 1; incomplete evidence allowed (Deng 2012)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Oprindelig kildeFei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering link ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
Aliasser
Relaterede88
ResuméD-TOPSIS (Modified TOPSIS based on D-Numbers (Deng Evidence Theory)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: D-TOPSIS · BWM. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare