Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Modificeret TOPSIS baseret på D-tal (Deng Evidence Theory)× | Analytisk Hierarkiproces× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Beslutningstagning | Beslutningstagning |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2016 | 1980 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | D-Number ranking — D:Ω→[0,1] with Σ_{B⊆Ω} D(B) ≤ 1; incomplete evidence allowed (Deng 2012) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Aliasser | — | — |
| Relaterede | 8 | 8 |
| Resumé≠ | D-TOPSIS (Modified TOPSIS based on D-Numbers (Deng Evidence Theory)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|