Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Kriterie-vigtighed gennem interkriterie-korrelation× | Additiv Ratio Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Beslutningstagning | Beslutningstagning |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 1995 | 2010 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Type≠ | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Aliasser | — | — |
| Relaterede | 8 | 8 |
| Resumé≠ | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|