Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Rangordning af alternativer baseret på afstand til idealløsning× | Analytisk Hierarkiproces× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Beslutningstagning | Beslutningstagning |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2021 | 1980 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Distance from ideal and anti-ideal (geometric mean compromise) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D. (2021). Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Environment, Development and Sustainability DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Aliasser | — | — |
| Relaterede | 8 | 8 |
| Resumé≠ | CRADIS (Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|