Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Congruence Analysis× | Most Similar Systems Design× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Political Science | Political Science |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2012 | 1970 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Alexander L. George & Andrew Bennett; Joachim Blatter & Markus Haverland | John Stuart Mill (method of difference); Przeworski & Teune (systems framing) |
| Type≠ | Small-N, theory-centered case-study method | Small-N comparative case-selection design |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Blatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 9780230249707 | Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422 |
| Aliasser | Congruence method, Congruence procedure, Theory-centered case study, Predicted-observed congruence testing | MSSD, Most similar cases design, Mill's method of difference, Comparable cases strategy |
| Relaterede | 3 | 3 |
| Resumé≠ | Congruence analysis is a small-N, theory-centered case-study method that adjudicates between competing theories by comparing each theory's concrete predictions with the empirical observations in one or a few cases. The researcher derives specific, observable expectations from each rival theory and then assesses which theory's predictions are most congruent with what is actually observed. Described as the congruence method by George and Bennett and developed into a full explanatory approach by Blatter and Haverland, it makes theories — rather than cases or variables — the central objects of inference. | The most similar systems design (MSSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases as alike as possible on many background characteristics but differing on the outcome of interest. By matching cases so that most potential confounders are held roughly constant, the design isolates the few factors that vary alongside the outcome as the candidate causes. Rooted in John Stuart Mill's method of difference and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is a cornerstone of comparative politics for drawing causal inferences from a handful of countries or cases. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|