ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Kriteriekorrelation og standardafvigelse objektiv vægtning×Additiv Ratio Assessment×
FagområdeBeslutningstagningBeslutningstagning
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Oprindelsesår20102010
OphavspersonWang, Y. M., Luo, Y.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeCorrelation-penalised standard-deviation weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Oprindelig kildeWang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Aliasser
Relaterede88
ResuméCCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: CCSD · ARAS. Hentet 2026-06-17 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare