ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineIndividual change statistics

Reliable Change Index

The Reliable Change Index (RCI) is a statistic that tells whether the change in an individual client's score on a measure, from before to after an intervention, is large enough that it is unlikely to be an artifact of the instrument's measurement error. Introduced by Neil Jacobson and Paula Truax in 1991 as one half of their two-part definition of clinically significant change, it converts a pre-post difference into a standardized value and compares it against a critical cutoff, typically 1.96, so that practitioners and researchers can classify each client as reliably improved, unchanged, or reliably deteriorated.

Otevřít v MethodMindJiž brzyPoužijte, porovnejte, získejte návod
Nástroje a zdroje
Stáhnout prezentaci
Učte se a objevujte
VideoJiž brzy

Přečíst celou metodu

Pouze pro členy

Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.

Přihlásit se

Mapa metod

Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.

Zdroje

  1. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
  2. Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986). A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index. Behavior Therapy, 17(3), 305–308. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(86)80060-0

Jak citovat tuto stránku

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Reliable Change Index for Individual Outcome Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/social-work/reliable-change-index

Která metoda?

Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.

Porovnat vedle sebe

Odkazuje sem

ScholarGateReliable Change Index (Reliable Change Index for Individual Outcome Evaluation). Získáno 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/cs/social-work/reliable-change-index · Datová sada: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026