ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineCartography of controversies

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Otevřít v MethodMindJiž brzyPoužijte, porovnejte, získejte návod
Nástroje a zdroje
Stáhnout prezentaci
Učte se a objevujte
VideoJiž brzy

Přečíst celou metodu

Pouze pro členy

Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.

Přihlásit se

Mapa metod

Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.

Zdroje

  1. Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694
  2. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558

Jak citovat tuto stránku

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping

Která metoda?

Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.

Porovnat vedle sebe

Odkazuje sem

ScholarGateControversy Mapping (Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)). Získáno 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/cs/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping · Datová sada: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026