Redaction Criticism
Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.
Přečíst celou metodu
Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.
Mapa metod
Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.
Zdroje
- Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
- Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link ↗
Jak citovat tuto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/religious-studies/redaction-criticism
Která metoda?
Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.
- Form CriticismReligious Studies↔ porovnat
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ porovnat
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ porovnat
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ porovnat
Odkazuje sem
Podobné metody
Našli jste na této stránce chybu? Nahlaste ji nebo navrhněte opravu →