ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineSurvey / expert elicitation

Policy Delphi

The policy Delphi is a structured, iterative technique for eliciting and organising informed opinion on contested policy issues. Unlike the classical Delphi, which seeks consensus on a forecast, the policy Delphi is explicitly designed to generate the strongest possible opposing positions on a policy question and to expose the full range of options, supporting arguments and disagreements among a panel of knowledgeable stakeholders. Introduced by Murray Turoff in 1970, it conducts several anonymous rounds in which participants rate policy statements on dimensions such as desirability and feasibility, see aggregated feedback and the reasoning behind divergent views, and revise their positions — surfacing structured intelligence for decision-makers rather than a forced agreement.

Otevřít v MethodMindJiž brzyPoužijte, porovnejte, získejte návod
Nástroje a zdroje
Stáhnout prezentaci
Učte se a objevujte
VideoJiž brzy

Přečíst celou metodu

Pouze pro členy

Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.

Přihlásit se

Mapa metod

Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.

Zdroje

  1. Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149–171. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7
  2. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.) (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 9780201042948

Jak citovat tuto stránku

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/public-policy/policy-delphi

Která metoda?

Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.

Porovnat vedle sebe

Odkazuje sem

ScholarGatePolicy Delphi (Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation). Získáno 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/cs/public-policy/policy-delphi · Datová sada: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026