Most Different Systems Design
The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
Přečíst celou metodu
Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.
Mapa metod
Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.
Zdroje
- Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077 ↗
- Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521676564
Jak citovat tuto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/political-science/most-different-systems-design
Která metoda?
Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ porovnat
- Process TracingPsychometrika↔ porovnat
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ porovnat
Odkazuje sem
Podobné metody
Našli jste na této stránce chybu? Nahlaste ji nebo navrhněte opravu →