Democratic Norms Support Measurement
This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.
Přečíst celou metodu
Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.
Mapa metod
Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.
Zdroje
- Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392-409. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 ↗
- Claassen, C. (2020). Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12452 ↗
Jak citovat tuto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/political-psychology/democratic-norms-support-scale
Která metoda?
Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.
- Elite Cue ExperimentPolitická psychologie↔ porovnat
- Škála politické důvěryPolitická psychologie↔ porovnat
- Support for Political Violence MeasurePolitická psychologie↔ porovnat
Odkazuje sem
Podobné metody
Našli jste na této stránce chybu? Nahlaste ji nebo navrhněte opravu →