Acceptability Judgment Task
The acceptability judgment task is the modern, quantified successor to informal grammaticality judgments: instead of a single linguist marking a sentence grammatical or not, many participants rate carefully controlled sentences on a graded scale, and the ratings are analyzed statistically. Built on factorial designs with fillers and counterbalancing, and on response formats from Likert scales to magnitude estimation to forced choice, it turns intuition into replicable, gradient data. The approach anchors the experimental-syntax program associated with Jon Sprouse and colleagues, which tests grammatical hypotheses with the same methodological rigor as psycholinguistic experiments.
Přečíst celou metodu
Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.
Mapa metod
Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.
Zdroje
- Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002 ↗
- Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32–68. DOI: 10.2307/416793 ↗
- Schütze, C. T. (2016). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Language Science Press. DOI: 10.17169/langsci.b89.100 ↗
Jak citovat tuto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Acceptability Judgment Task. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/linguistics/acceptability-judgment-task
Která metoda?
Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.
- Elicited Imitation TaskLingvistika↔ porovnat
- Grammaticality Judgment TaskLingvistika↔ porovnat
- Self-Paced Reading TaskLingvistika↔ porovnat
Odkazuje sem
Podobné metody
Našli jste na této stránce chybu? Nahlaste ji nebo navrhněte opravu →