Porovnat metody

	Vizuální elicitace reflexivní tematické analýzy	Participatory Visual Analysis
Obor	Kvalitativní metody	Kvalitativní metody
Rodina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok vzniku	2000s–2010s (integrated practice established ~2010–2020)	1990s (formalized participatory visual methods); Freire roots 1970s
Tvůrce	Compound method: visual elicitation (Harper 2002; Clark 1999) + reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke 2006, 2019)	Wang & Burris (photovoice tradition); broader roots in participatory action research (Fals-Borda, Freire)
Typ	Qualitative compound design	Qualitative participatory research approach
Původní zdroj	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.	Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education and Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.
Další názvy	photo-elicitation reflexive TA, image-elicitation RTA, visual-prompt reflexive thematic analysis, VERTA	PVA, participatory visual methods, collaborative visual inquiry, community-based visual analysis
Příbuzné	5	5
Shrnutí	Visual elicitation reflexive thematic analysis (VERTA) is a qualitative compound design that uses photographs, drawings, or other images as conversation starters in in-depth interviews and then analyses the resulting talk using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework. The visual prompt lowers the communication barrier, stimulates richer narrative, and anchors abstract experiences to concrete imagery, while the reflexive analytic approach treats theme development as an active, iterative, and researcher-engaged interpretive process rather than a coding algorithm.	Participatory Visual Analysis (PVA) is a qualitative research approach in which community members or research participants actively produce and interpret visual materials — photographs, drawings, videos, or maps — as a means of documenting their own experiences, surfacing knowledge, and informing action. Rather than the researcher imposing an analytical gaze on pre-existing images, participants are co-investigators who create visual data and participate in its interpretation, making the method both epistemologically democratic and particularly powerful for accessing marginalized or hard-to-articulate perspectives.