ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

UTA*×Metoda vážení kritérií CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method)×
OborRozhodováníRozhodování
RodinaMCDMMCDM
Rok vzniku19852016
TvůrceSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypAdditive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgementsRelative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Původní zdrojSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Další názvy
Příbuzné88
ShrnutíUTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: UTASTAR · CILOS. Získáno 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare