ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Analýza stop opotřebení×Keramická petrografie×
OborArcheologieArcheologie
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku19801976
TvůrceLawrence KeeleyPeter Stimmung
TypTool function inferenceClay and temper sourcing
Původní zdrojKeeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗Quinn, P. S. (2013). Ceramic Petrology: The Interpretation of Ceramic Artifacts in Archaeological Science. Archaeopress. link ↗
Další názvymicrowear, tool use analysisceramic thin section analysis, pottery petrography
Příbuzné44
ShrnutíUse-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies.Ceramic petrography analyzes pottery through microscopic examination of thin sections cut from pottery sherds. This method determines clay sources, identifies non-plastic inclusions (temper), and reconstructs pottery production technology. Pioneered by Peter Stimmung and others, ceramic petrography reveals whether pottery was made locally or imported, and whether specific production groups or workshops created vessels with distinctive raw material recipes.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Use-Wear Analysis · Ceramic Petrography. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare