Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Typological Theory× | Qualitative Comparative Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Political Science | Political Science |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2005 | 1987 |
| Tvůrce≠ | Alexander L. George & Andrew Bennett; Colin Elman | Charles C. Ragin |
| Typ≠ | Configurational theory-building method for case studies | Set-theoretic, configurational comparative method |
| Původní zdroj≠ | George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262572224 | Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520058347 |
| Další názvy | Typological theorizing, Explanatory typologies, Typological theory building, Configurational typologies | QCA, csQCA, fsQCA, Configurational comparative method |
| Příbuzné≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Shrnutí≠ | Typological theory is a configurational approach to theory building in which the researcher specifies types — distinct combinations of the values of explanatory variables — and develops contingent generalizations about the outcomes associated with each combination. Codified by Alexander George and Andrew Bennett and refined by Colin Elman's explanatory typologies, it organizes cases into the cells of a property space defined by the interaction of variables, using case studies to populate and refine the types. It embraces causal complexity by treating combinations, not isolated variables, as the units of explanation. | Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a set-theoretic, configurational method that identifies which combinations of conditions are necessary or sufficient for an outcome across a set of cases. Developed by Charles Ragin, it treats each case as a configuration of set memberships, builds a truth table of all logically possible combinations, and uses Boolean algebra to minimize them into the simplest expressions that account for the outcome. It bridges qualitative case knowledge and cross-case generalization, embracing causal complexity through conjunctural causation, equifinality, and asymmetry. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|