ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Časově segmentovaná scientometrická analýza×Ko-citační analýza×
OborScientometrieBibliometrie
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1980s–1990s1973
TvůrceDerived from scientometrics tradition; temporal slicing formalized in longitudinal bibliometric studies from the 1980s onwardHenry Small
TypQuantitative longitudinal analysisMethod
Původní zdrojSmall, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. link ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Další názvytemporal scientometrics, period-based scientometric analysis, time-window scientometrics, longitudinal scientometric analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Příbuzné65
ShrnutíTime-sliced scientometric analysis divides a bibliographic corpus into discrete temporal windows — commonly five- or ten-year periods — and applies standard scientometric indicators (publication counts, citation rates, h-index, collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence) within each slice. By comparing results across slices, researchers can reconstruct how a scientific field has grown, shifted focus, formed new collaborations, or declined in influence over time. The approach combines the rigor of quantitative scientometrics with an explicit longitudinal dimension.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Time-sliced Scientometric Analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare