Porovnat metody

	Telefonicky asistovaný polostrukturovaný rozhovor	Osobní semistrukturovaný rozhovor
Obor	Metodologie dotazníkových šetření	Metodologie dotazníkových šetření
Rodina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok vzniku	1970s–1980s (widespread adoption in health and social research)	1940s onward; widely codified in the 1980s–1990s
Tvůrce	Adapted from face-to-face semi-structured interviewing; telephone use in social research documented from the 1970s onward	Rooted in sociological interview traditions; systematised by researchers including Robert Merton and Paul Lazarsfeld (focused interview, 1940s) and later elaborated by Steinar Kvale
Typ	Qualitative data collection technique	Qualitative data collection technique
Původní zdroj	Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health, 31(4), 391–398.	Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198722519
Další názvy	telephone semi-structured interview, phone-based semi-structured interview, TASI, telephone qualitative interview	in-person semi-structured interview, semi-structured personal interview, guided face-to-face interview, FFSSI
Příbuzné	6	6
Shrnutí	A telephone-assisted semi-structured interview is a qualitative data collection technique in which a researcher conducts a guided conversation with a participant over the telephone, using a pre-designed topic guide that balances predetermined questions with freedom to probe and explore. It combines the flexibility of semi-structured interviewing with the geographic reach and logistical convenience of telephone communication, making it widely used in health, social, and organizational research.	A face-to-face semi-structured interview is a qualitative data collection technique in which a researcher meets a participant in person and follows a prepared topic guide of open-ended questions while retaining the flexibility to probe, reorder, and explore emerging themes. It combines the consistency of a predetermined agenda with the depth and responsiveness of an open dialogue, making it one of the most widely used methods in qualitative and mixed-methods research across the social, health, and educational sciences.