ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Systematický přehled literatury×Přehledový článek×
OborScientometrieScientometrie
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)Pre-20th century practice; peer-reviewed methodological guidance from 2000s onward
TvůrceArchie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)Traditional academic practice; formalized discussion by Green, Johnson & Adams (2006)
TypEvidence synthesis methodologyLiterature review methodology
Původní zdrojKitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. DOI ↗
Další názvySLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature reviewtraditional review, expert review, unsystematic review, narrative synthesis
Příbuzné56
ShrnutíA systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.A narrative review is a broad, author-directed synthesis of published literature on a topic, written to summarize, interpret, and contextualize existing knowledge without following the rigorous, pre-registered search and selection protocols that characterize systematic reviews. It draws on the author's expertise to weave disparate sources into a coherent account that identifies themes, debates, and directions for future research.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Systematic Literature Review · Narrative Review. Získáno 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare