ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Standardy pro statistické vykazování: transparentní vykazování analýz×Struktura IMRaD: Úvod, Metody, Výsledky a Diskuze×
OborAkademické psaníAkademické psaní
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku20051970
TvůrceStatistical and methodological literature; emphasized by Cumming (2013), ICMJE, and replication crisis discussionsInternational scientific publishing community (adopted widely by 1970s)
TypGuidelineGuideline
Původní zdrojCumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. DOI ↗International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. link ↗
Další názvyreporting statistics, statistical transparency, effect size reportingIMRaD, IMRAD, scientific manuscript structure
Příbuzné45
ShrnutíTransparent reporting of statistical results—including effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, and assumptions—is essential for scientific integrity and reproducibility. Many published studies report p-values in isolation without effect sizes or confidence intervals, making it impossible for readers to assess the magnitude of findings. Statistical reporting standards, emphasized by Cumming (2013), the American Statistical Association, and the ICMJE, require effect sizes, confidence intervals, and discussion of uncertainty. This enables readers to judge whether findings are practically significant (not just statistically significant) and to compare effect sizes across studies in meta-analyses. Poor statistical reporting wastes research and prevents proper synthesis of evidence.IMRaD is the standard organizational framework for scientific manuscripts in biomedical and natural sciences research. It separates reporting into four sequential sections—Introduction (why the research was conducted), Methods (how it was done), Results (what was found), and Discussion (what the findings mean)—enabling readers to understand, evaluate, and reproduce the work. Adopted as best practice by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since the 1970s, IMRaD structure is now mandated or strongly recommended by most peer-reviewed journals.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Statistical Reporting Standards · IMRaD Structure. Získáno 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare