ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Hodnocení screeningových testů×Návrh studie diagnostické přesnosti×
OborEpidemiologieKlinický výzkum
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s2003-2015
TvůrceWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluationBossuyt, Reitsma, and STARD group (2003); clinical epidemiology pioneers
TypObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation designResearch Design
Původní zdrojWilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40–44. DOI ↗
Další názvyscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STEdiagnostic accuracy study, test accuracy, STARD, diagnostic evaluation
Příbuzné62
ShrnutíScreening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.A diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a new diagnostic test (or biomarker, imaging modality, clinical assessment) detects the presence or absence of disease compared to a reference standard (gold standard). Standardized since 2003 by the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) initiative, diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental to clinical medicine, determining whether and how new tests can improve patient diagnosis and treatment.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Screening Test Evaluation · Diagnostic Accuracy Study Design. Získáno 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare