ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Scientometrická analýza×Ko-citační analýza×
OborScientometrieBibliometrie
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work)1973
TvůrceV. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods)Henry Small
TypQuantitative literature analysisMethod
Původní zdrojNalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka. link ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Další názvyscientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Příbuzné65
ShrnutíScientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Scientometric Analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare