ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Metody syntézy kvalitativních důkazů×NVivo a ATLAS.ti pro kvalitativní analýzu×
OborKvalitativní výzkumKvalitativní výzkum
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku19881999
TvůrceGeorge Noblit and Dwight HareQSR International (NVivo) and Scientific Software-Citational (ATLAS.ti)
TypMethodTool
Původní zdrojNoblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803931725Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412903653
Další názvyqualitative meta-synthesis, meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, systematic review of qualitative studiesCAQDAS, QDA software, qualitative analysis software, NVivo
Příbuzné44
ShrnutíQualitative evidence synthesis (QES) is a systematic method for combining and interpreting findings from multiple qualitative research studies to generate higher-level understanding and theory. Different approaches—meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, meta-narrative review, critical interpretive synthesis—each have distinct philosophical underpinnings and analytical procedures. Introduced by Noblit and Hare (1988) with meta-ethnography, qualitative synthesis has evolved alongside systematic reviews of quantitative research. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numerical effect sizes, qualitative synthesis integrates concepts, themes, and interpretations from primary studies, identifying patterns, conflicts, and emergent theory. QES is increasingly used in health research, social sciences, and education to understand complex phenomena, translate research into practice, and identify gaps in evidence.NVivo and ATLAS.ti are Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) programs that facilitate coding, organizing, and analyzing qualitative data—including text (transcripts, documents), images, video, and audio. NVivo, developed by QSR International, is widely used in academic research and supports data organization, coding, memo-writing, retrieval, and analysis visualizations. ATLAS.ti, developed by Scientific Software-Citational, emphasizes hermeneutic interpretation and network visualization. Both tools were introduced in the late 1990s and have become standard across disciplines. CAQDAS is not analysis itself—the researcher must make analytical decisions—but rather augments human analysis by managing large data volumes, organizing codes systematically, tracking analysis decisions, and generating visualizations. These tools improve transparency and rigor in qualitative research.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 4 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Methods · NVivo and ATLAS.ti for Qualitative Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare