ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Protokolová metaanalýza×Přehled založený na PRISMA×
OborScientometrieScientometrie
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1990s–2015 (Cochrane established 1993; PROSPERO launched 2011; PRISMA-P 2015)2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020
TvůrceCochrane Collaboration; formalized through PROSPERO and PRISMA-P initiativesDavid Moher and PRISMA Group
TypEvidence synthesis with pre-registered protocolStructured reporting framework for systematic reviews
Původní zdrojHiggins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.4). Cochrane. link ↗Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗
Další názvypre-registered meta-analysis, prospective meta-analysis, registered meta-analysis, protocol-driven meta-analysisPRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review
Příbuzné45
ShrnutíA protocol-based meta-analysis is a meta-analysis conducted according to a detailed, pre-registered protocol that specifies all key methodological decisions — research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, outcome measures, and statistical methods — before data collection begins. Pre-registration, typically through PROSPERO or a comparable registry, distinguishes this approach from post-hoc or exploratory meta-analyses and substantially reduces the risk of selective reporting and outcome switching.A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Protocol-based Meta-analysis · PRISMA-based review. Získáno 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare