Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Přehled založený na PRISMA× | Přehled× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Scientometrie | Scientometrie |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020 | 2005 (updated methodology); roots in Cooper (1982) |
| Tvůrce≠ | David Moher and PRISMA Group | Robin Whittemore & Kathleen Knafl |
| Typ≠ | Structured reporting framework for systematic reviews | Systematic review method |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ | Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. DOI ↗ |
| Další názvy | PRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review | integrative literature review, integrative research review, ILR, integrative synthesis |
| Příbuzné≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Shrnutí≠ | A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process. | An integrative review is a systematic method for synthesising literature that allows the simultaneous inclusion of diverse study designs — experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental — as well as theoretical papers. Unlike the conventional systematic review, which is restricted to controlled trials or a single methodology, the integrative review builds a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon by drawing on the full breadth of the relevant evidence base. The method follows a rigorous, structured pipeline to ensure transparency and minimise bias. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|