Porovnat metody

	Pragmatický smíšený design	Vícestupňový smíšený design
Obor	Design výzkumu	Design výzkumu
Rodina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok vzniku	Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century	2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research)
Tvůrce	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Typ	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Původní zdroj	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483substitute
Další názvy	pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods	multiphase design, multiproject mixed methods, programmatic mixed methods, multistage mixed methods
Příbuzné	6	6
Shrnutí	Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.	The multiphase mixed methods design is a sustained research program in which quantitative and qualitative strands are combined across three or more sequential phases — or across multiple related projects — to address a central program objective. Each phase builds on the prior phase's findings, making the design well-suited to long-term evaluation, intervention development, and large-scale program assessment where a single data-collection cycle cannot fully address the complexity of the research problem.